Atiku releases ‘evidence’ of election result from INEC website

Atiku releases ‘evidence’ of election result from INEC website

The PDP Presidential candidate in the February 23rd presidential election, Atiku Abubakar, has insisted the result from the server of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) which shows he defeated President Buhari in the presidential election.

In his submission to the presidential election tribunal, Atiku gave
the “unique MAC address and Microsoft product ID of the INEC server”
from where the results were obtained.

INEC had on February 27th, declared that President Buhari polled a
total of 15,191,847 votes to defeat Atiku who polled a total
of 11,262,978 votes.

However in his petition submitted at the election tribunal, Atiku
claimed he polled a total of 18,356,732 votes to defeat Buhari, who,
according to what the INEC server showed his team, polled 16,741,430

INEC while reacting to Atiku’s claim, said the figures that was presented by the PDP canidate were forged.

In response to INEC’s claim, Atiku and the PDP in a statement
released today, said the  address of the server from which the results
were obtained are unique to INEC.

“The Servers from which the said figures were derived belong to the
first Respondent (INEC). The figures and votes were transmitted to the
first Respondent’s Presidential Result’s Server 1 and thereafter
aggregated in INEC_PRES_RSLT_SRV2019, whose Physical Address or unique
Mac Address is 94-57-A5-DC-64-B9 with Microsoft Product ID
00252-7000000000-AA535. The above descriptions are unique to the 15t
Respondent’s Server,” they said.

“There is no conjecture in the votes and scores in the table pleaded
by the Petitioners. The figures are factual. The Spokesperson for the
2nd Respondent’s Campaign Organization openly admitted that the data in
question was in the first Respondent’s Server when he wrote and
submitted a petition to the Inspector General of Police and the Director
General of the Department of State Services (DSS) asking the Security
agencies to investigate the 2nd Petitioner herein for allegedly hacking
into the Server of the 1St Respondent and obtaining the data in

“Specifically, Mr. Festus Keyamo, SAN, the Spokesperson of the 2nd
Respondent claimed in the said petition that it was the first Petitioner
who smuggled the data into the Server.”

Atiku and the PDP also alleged the INEC chairman “committed grave
errors in the final collation exercise” for the election by “falsely
crediting” some persons with political parties, including “Okotie
Christopher, Reverend Dr. Onwubuya and Ojinika Jeff Chinze.”

“The grave errors referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5 above were under
the hands and signature of the first Respondent’s Chairman, (who was
also the Returning Officer) in the conduct of the final collation of the
results of the Presidential Election,” they added.

“The Petitioners state that the final results as declared by the
first respondent are those that were transmitted online to the website
of the first Respondent (www”

Share this:

Related posts

Leave a Comment